Why Retrofitting IAQ Is Cheaper Than Managing Sick Buildings
- David Mallinson

- 3 days ago
- 1 min read

Many buildings were designed for an era when indoor air quality expectations were lower, energy was cheaper, and health impacts were poorly understood.
Today, those buildings are becoming liabilities.
The True Cost of a “Sick” Building
Poor IAQ manifests as:
Frequent occupant complaints
Higher absenteeism
Reduced productivity
Tenant dissatisfaction
Increased maintenance calls
Reputational damage
These costs rarely appear on a balance sheet — but they erode asset performance every day.
Managing a sick building is an ongoing operational drain, not a one-time problem.
Why Retrofitting IAQ Solutions Makes Financial Sense
Modern IAQ retrofit solutions are:
Non-invasive
HVAC-integrated
Scalable
Designed for occupied buildings
This allows owners to improve IAQ without major disruption or plant replacement.
Compared to structural HVAC upgrades or continuous ventilation increases, air purification retrofits are:
Faster to deploy
Lower in capital cost
Easier to validate
Immediately effective
Avoiding the “Deferred Cost Trap”
Delaying IAQ upgrades often leads to:
Emergency interventions later
Forced compliance upgrades
Tenant loss
Higher retrofit costs under time pressure
Proactive IAQ retrofitting avoids this trap by:
Extending asset relevance
Improving operational stability
Protecting future valuation
From Liability to Performance Asset
Retrofitting IAQ transforms buildings from reactive environments into controlled, resilient systems.
It is cheaper to fix the air than to manage the consequences of ignoring it.
Indoor Air Quality is no longer a background technical issue it is a core determinant of asset value, financial performance, and long-term resilience.
Buildings that treat IAQ strategically will outperform those that treat it as an afterthought.





Comments